I was online today doing some mindless web
searching, when I found some information about planned redevelopment in
Unionville, CT. This is the second redevelopment of
Unionville. The first one happened in the early to middle 1960s. It appears that the plan is to return
Unionville back to what it looked like before they redeveloped it the first time. Only this time,
Unionville will become a typical high dollar
Yuppieville mascarading behind the facade of the old New England factory town that it traditionally was.
Unionville is part of
Farmington, CT. Years ago it was the blue collar "other side of the tracks" from old money, highbrow,
Farmington proper.
Unionville was the factory town with the Charles House Co., which was a felt factory, and Pioneer Steel Ball, which made ball bearings. There were other smaller factories at one time too. I don't remember what they made, but I do remember where they were located.They were still up and running when I was a child. They are no longer there, and the buildings were demolished a long time ago during the
redevelopment project in the 1960s. The Charles House and Pioneer buildings are still there, abandoned rotting corpses that they are, and ready for renovation. The plan is to turn them into condos once major environmental clean up concerns are addressed.
As a child I can remember the old
Unionville. South Main Street was a canyon of two story building along both sides of the street. It was a typical New England blue collar town. There were two banks, three or four small mom and pop grocery stores, a butcher shop, a couple of department stores that sold working class clothing, three barber shops, three pharmacies...two with lunch counters and soda fountains, a cheap hotel, and a bar and grill. The First National supermarket didn't come in until the early 1960s. Soon the butcher shop and a couple of the small grocery stores went out of business. That was the first wave of the redevelopment. Just beyond the downtown area, were residential neighborhoods. Most of the homes in the neighborhoods were small wooden frame homes that had been built in the early 1900s. Along Main Street heading toward
Collinsville, there were some large Gothic and Victorian homes. I would guess that these were the homes of
Unionville's captains of industry, who owned the various factories during the Industrial Revolution. Many of them had been, and are still divided into multiple residential rental units. Some are professional offices. A few are still large private residences. Also, I remember the ruins of a canal that ran right through the center of the residential sections of town. It had supplied water for the electric power company and the various mills at one time, but was no longer usable. The dam that supplied the canal with water from the
Farmington River had been destroyed during the flood of 1955. Over the years it slowly filled in with dirt through
erosion, and today all you can see is an indentation behind the homes that at onetime lined that canal. I'm sure many children had used that canal as a mosquito infested swimming hole in times gone by.
On the other side of the tracks and with about 3 miles of farmland comfortably separating the two from the working class masses,
Farmington was where the professional money and old money lived. Stately 18
th century colonial homes line both Main Street and High Street. There was, and still is, very little shopping there, except for a very high end grocery store, a women's clothing boutique, a bakery and some professional offices. Most
Farmingtonites did their shopping in Hartford, West Hartford, or typically had other people do their shopping for them.
Demographically, the contrast between
Farmington and
Unionville are world's apart too. Many of the residents of
Farmington can trace their ancestry back to the time of the Mayflower or earlier and that period of colonization in America. They were not leaving England to escape religious persecution. They were gentry settlers who came to this country to increase their fortunes. Most of
Farmington's "old families" are
descended from these settlers. They are gentry
descended from gentry. By contrast, many of the
Unionville families can trace their ancestry back to the early 1900s Eastern European immigrants that came here to work in the factories in order to have a better life than they had in the "old country."
Sometime in the middle 1960s, the town decided to redevelop
Unionville. All those old buildings were torn down, and a smattering of one and two story buildings were built. Most of the small businesses left for good. Now 50 years later, the plan is to "New Urbanize"
Unionville back to what is was when I was growing up. The only difference is it will now be Yuppie rather than working class. This is a trend that is happening all over America and parts of Western Europe including England. It seems like this is becoming the basic
modus operandi: Take something that works, break it, and then rebuild it so it is more expensive, eliminating use or participation except for the favored few and their pets. This is why I'm skeptical about
redevelopment plans.
Consequently, I have mixed feelings about New
Urbanism. Here's what I like about it: First of all, I tend to have an urban mindset. Being in the country drives me nuts. I like convenience. I like the convenience of not having to drive everywhere. Having shopping and entertainment facilities within walking distance of where you live is wonderful. I'm also not in love with the small single family home in a suburban neighborhood, even though I live in one. That's because I hate
yard work of any kind, not because I think that people should be forced to live in high density housing for "sustainability" purposes. I consider my single family home a drum warehouse where I reside. It's easy to load equipment out the front door, and I can practice without disturbing the neighbors. That being said, I would gladly trade where I live for an affordable high density housing living arrangement with no outdoor
maintenance as long as there was safe, secure storage for my professional equipment, and I had convenient access to it 24/7. It would also have to be soundproof so that I could practice drums, or even have band practice without disturbing the neighbors.
I enjoy spending time in the New
Urbanism planned communities of King Farm,
Kentlands, and the recently
redeveloped downtown area of
Rockville in Montgomery County, Maryland.
Kentlands and King Farm are built on former working farms.
Rockville was redeveloped from a plain vanilla middle class outer reach Washington, DC suburb, into a upper middle class
Yuppieville, with high dollar condos, fancy restaurants, and boutique level shops.
Rockville reminds me of many of the downtown areas of the small European cities that I visited like Trier, Germany and
Ipswich, England—but on a much more modern scale. You have streets lined with shops and restaurants at street level, and five or six stories of luxury residential units above them. Parking is available in parking garages, and residents can purchase monthly parking permits and park in special garages just for them. There is ample metered parking for visitors in other garages and on the street. Downtown
Rockville is served also by Metro,
Metrobus, Ride On Bus, and MARC commuter rail. Eventually, I'm sure these planned communities will be connected by light rail systems, which in turn will connect with other light rail, subway, and commuter rail transit systems. I have no problem with that, being someone who finds driving a necessary inconvenience, necessary because I have to haul band equipment around at all hours of the night. Driving is also a necessary inconvenience, because the public transportation system in the Washington, DC area is not set up to get from suburb to suburb. It's designed to get people from the suburbs into the downtown area during commuting and business hours, and to get people around inside the city during business hours and early entertainment hours at night. I'm hoping that over the next 20 years that will change. Massive subsidies of public transportation projects are fine by me. I don't support public transportation projects out of any love of environmental issues. Most environmental issues are bullshit designed to grease the palms of certain liberals with money either forced out of the masses, or "
guilted" out of Useful Idiots.
Here's what I don't like about the way that New
Urbanism is being
implemented: First and foremost is the very obvious
excludent social engineering. I have yet to find any contemporary New
Urbanism planned community that isn't geared exclusively to the high dollar six figure professionals of the Upper Middle Class. You can gate a community with a gate, or you can gate a community with an economic gate. This makes me wonder what these urban planning Socialists have in store for the working classes and lower middle class. This is how I envision the planned
communities for the lower middle class, working class, and underclass...Ghetto! After all, those "scum" can't be allowed to stink up the enclaves of the sanctimonious Educated Elites.
Part of the social engineering process is to "dumb down" the working class and lower middle class standard of living, just like the public education system has been "dumbed down" for the masses. The way you do this is through economic "manslaughter." The best way to do this is by tax increases and
skyrocketing energy costs, which affect everything else. As the lower classes are forced out of their small single family homes due to unaffordable energy costs and taxes, they will be forced into government subsidised, crowded, utilitarian housing. How much housing you get will be based on your "need," which will be determined by government managers. A single person living alone only needs a room in a group house, or at most, a studio efficiency unit.
There will be very little luxuries in the New
Urbanism planned communities for the "little people." Heating and
air conditioning will be controlled from a central location at a temperature that is set by government "managers" who know what's better for us than us. Shopping will be limited to what the elites determine that the little people need. Parking will be almost non-existent. I'm sure there will be places to park work trucks, but there is no doubt in my mind that they will be located away from the residential units. You will have to take public transportation, ride a bike, or walk to get to them. People that don't need vehicles for their work will be "strongly discouraged" from owning any form of private transportation, except for a bicycle. The little people can ride the bus or Metro to their job, and then ride it home. This will remove a lot of cars from the road, so that the upper middle class Elites won't have to sit in traffic jams. All this talk about "sustainability" is crap. It's a social engineering tool to establish a feudal society in America of a ruling class, a nobility class of government managers and their equivalents, and a serf class of everyone else.
I would have no problem with New
Urbanism if it was designed to integrate all sections of the Middle Class into the same residential areas, with a large variety of shopping, entertainment, and restaurants of all price ranges in the same locations. However, that is not the case. New
Urbanism as it is currently being implemented, is designed to socially engineer society into the "haves" and the "have
nots." Unfortunately, this wonderful concept at its face value is being utilized as one more tool to turn the United States of America into a Communist nation. That being said, I still find it a pleasure to walk around downtown
Rockville,
Kentlands, King Farm or the Rio, and envision what it would be like to be able to afford to live in places like that. Once the re-redevelopment of
Unionville is
complete, it will be interesting to walk down the main drag and see how many nostalgia memories it will evoke. Will there be the reincarnation of Cliff
Fontaine standing next to the chair in his dark wood paneled barber shop, full of young men getting "regular boys" haircuts and reading Mad Magazine? Will there be the drug store with the soda fountain next door, with Old Man Flynn the druggist, making every kid and teenager pay for their soda in advance and then throwing them out the door as soon as they were done? Will the South End Market and
Kucia's Grocery Store come back to serve the residents of their respected neighborhoods? Will Myrtle Mills Factory Store and
Dubow's Department Store return, selling low cost clothing and work clothes? Will
Meatown return selling their daily and weekly specials of pork loin, cube steak and hamburger? Or will Whole Foods now replace Stop and Shop? Will some Yuppie fern bar serving $10 imported beers replace the Budweiser and
Balantine Ale drafts at the Old Town Grill? Will ethnic and high dollar restaurants replace Reynold's Lunch Counter, George's Pizza and
Friendly's? Will Parson's Paint and Hardware be replaced with Restoration Hardware and $100 garden trowels rather than nails and screws sold by the pound?
What about transportation? Currently, bus service into Hartford from Unionville and Farmington has deteriorated to where it is just barely usable during weekday rush hour. Will passenger rail served be restored like it was until the flood of 1955? Will their be a light rail line running from the center of
Unionville into Hartford, like the former trolleys along
Farmington Avenue connecting
Unionville,
Farmington, West Hartford, and Hartford? It will be interesting to see what comes out of this urban planning project.